Title: New Brudget.
Inevitable - February 14, 2009 09:00 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
The following statistics detail the spending plans of the current government.
Budget Statistics
Economy Rating: 78%
Basic Tax Rate: 32%
Budget Units Available from Taxation: 80
Income from loans: 0
National Debt: 0
Interest on National Debt: 0
Loan repayments: 0
Total Reserves: 53
Total budget units available: 65
Budget Spending
Education: 13 (13)
Police, Security and Justice: 8 (8)
Healthcare: 9 (9)
Transport: 14 (14)
Industry and Business: 6 (6)
Environment: 6 (6)
Social Welfare: 4 (4)
Administration: 3 (3)
Research: 2 (2)
Unused: 0 |
CJMiller - February 14, 2009 09:18 PM (GMT)
How much is 1 budget unit?
Pokemaniac John - February 14, 2009 09:23 PM (GMT)
For the sake of flexibility, some. CC0 might be more specific, but I doubt it, since he didn't give Ostentia a size. :P
Inevitable - February 14, 2009 09:48 PM (GMT)
When dealing with funding just refer to everything in Budget units.
The Speaker can tell people how much certain schemes will cost, though an approximate guess can be made based on previous spending.
For example, it takes 4 units to build some railways.
Cieran - February 16, 2009 04:25 PM (GMT)
Hold on, where did the extra sixteen units go? The reserves?...
HRH King Zog II - February 16, 2009 05:06 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Cieran @ Feb 16 2009, 05:25 PM) |
| Hold on, where did the extra sixteen units go? The reserves?... |
They vanished when the economy rating dropped below 80%
Cieran - February 16, 2009 06:54 PM (GMT)
No, I mean it says total units available is 81 and then later 65.
Also, has anyone else noticed that this is a Brudget not a Budget?...
Inevitable - February 16, 2009 07:08 PM (GMT)
Brudgets are tastier version of Budgets.
I know about that, don't ask me to explain it, it makes sense to me somehow.
Pokemaniac John - February 16, 2009 07:17 PM (GMT)
81 should be 80, and 15 of those went into the reserves.
CJMiller - February 16, 2009 07:33 PM (GMT)
Please modify such budget to remove all errors.
Inevitable - February 16, 2009 07:42 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Pokemaniac John @ Feb 16 2009, 07:17 PM) |
| 81 should be 80, and 15 of those went into the reserves. |
Then isn't the one in the statistics wrong?
Pokemaniac John - February 16, 2009 08:21 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Inevitable @ Feb 16 2009, 07:42 PM) |
| QUOTE (Pokemaniac John @ Feb 16 2009, 07:17 PM) | | 81 should be 80, and 15 of those went into the reserves. |
Then isn't the one in the statistics wrong?
|
There was an error on the part of a junior official. A team of highly trained bureaucrats has been dispatched to resolve the situation. :tophat:
Inevitable - February 16, 2009 09:11 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Pokemaniac John @ Feb 16 2009, 08:21 PM) |
| QUOTE (Inevitable @ Feb 16 2009, 07:42 PM) | | QUOTE (Pokemaniac John @ Feb 16 2009, 07:17 PM) | | 81 should be 80, and 15 of those went into the reserves. |
Then isn't the one in the statistics wrong?
|
There was an error on the part of a junior official. A team of highly trained bureaucrats has been dispatched to resolve the situation. :tophat:
|
That sounds... familiar...
Hmm...
Pokemaniac John - February 16, 2009 09:13 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Inevitable @ Feb 16 2009, 09:11 PM) |
| QUOTE (Pokemaniac John @ Feb 16 2009, 08:21 PM) | | QUOTE (Inevitable @ Feb 16 2009, 07:42 PM) | | QUOTE (Pokemaniac John @ Feb 16 2009, 07:17 PM) | | 81 should be 80, and 15 of those went into the reserves. |
Then isn't the one in the statistics wrong?
|
There was an error on the part of a junior official. A team of highly trained bureaucrats has been dispatched to resolve the situation. :tophat:
|
That sounds... familiar...
Hmm...
|
Don't ask too many questions. :ph43r: